On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:07:25 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >>Does ADDR= require APF authorization? > >From z/OS MVS Programming: Authorized Assembler Services Reference, >Volume 3(LLA-SDU), SA22-7611-11: > >Minimum authorization: Problem state or supervisor state, and any > PSW key. The GLOBAL, EOM, ADDR, ADDR64, > ADRNAPF and ADRNAPF64 parameters are > restricted to authorized users (APF > authorized, PSW key 0-7, or supervisor > state). > IOW, "Yes." (I had checked; my question was largely rhetorical, prefacing my following sentence concerning the limited usefulness of the construct.)
>BTW, did you really mean refreshable *data* sections, as opposed to >refreshable code sections with writable data sections?. > Yes. I can envision read-only data sections so frequently used that it's worth avoiding the I/O overhead of loading them for each job that uses them. Also the alternative you suggest: sharable writable data sections. This likely presumes a locking mechanism; perhaps even entitlements, else you're back in the Dark Ages of User Key CSA. There may be a better way. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
