In <CAE1XxDEaMWA=aMTmU8QXhzzeLKfPVCJUqgV=w5ycfgn+vz9...@mail.gmail.com>, on 12/06/2012 at 10:44 AM, John Gilmore <jwgli...@gmail.com> said:
>Let me therefore take full responsibility for that paraphrase myself. > AMODE(64) seems to me to be the only appreopiate way to mark an >object that is to be resident above the bar, and in particular, one >that while refreshable contains metadata, relocatable doubleword >pointers to locations within itself. AMODE(64) is not appropriate for a module that is not executable. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN