Yaaay! But why not 32767 or 65535? Actually32760 is plenty; just curious. Try passing HLASM 32768 to witness some bizarre behavior. But BPXBATCH is happy with 65535. 32760 was picked for several reasons: its the maximum blocksize and with an 8-byte header fits nicely in 32768.
W. Kevin Kelley - IBM POK Lab - z/OS Core Technical Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
