/* REXX */
 COUNTT = 0
 COUNTU = 0
 COUNTV = 0
 COUNTW = 0
 TAB.T = "COUNTT=COUNTT+1"
 TAB.U = "COUNTU=COUNTU+1"
 TAB.V = "COUNTV=COUNTV+1"
 TAB.W = "COUNTW=COUNTW+1"
 IDX = 'T'

 INTERPRET TAB.IDX
 SAY COUNTT
 SAY COUNTU
 SAY COUNTV
 SAY COUNTW

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:10 PM Wayne Bickerdike <wayn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Forgot the quotes!
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:07 PM Wayne Bickerdike <wayn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Or to be controversial:
>>
>> tab.T = countt=countT+1
>> tab.U = countU=countU+1
>> tab.V = countV=countV+1
>> tab.W = countW=countW+1
>>
>> INTERPRET tab.idx
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:01 PM Wayne Bickerdike <wayn...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> CA-IDEAL has SELECT FIRST ACTION AND SELECT EVERY ACTION. That I like.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 2:59 PM Wayne Bickerdike <wayn...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For brevity, if you don't like DO END.
>>>>
>>>>  select
>>>>     when idx="T" then countt=countt+1
>>>>     when idx="U" then countu=countu+1
>>>>     when idx="V" then countv=countv+1
>>>>     when idx="W" then countw=countw+1
>>>>     otherwise         countx=countx+1; end
>>>>
>>>> Could be :
>>>> SELECT( idx)
>>>>     when ("T") then countt=countt+1
>>>>     when ("U") then countu=countu+1
>>>>     when ("V") then countv=countv+1
>>>>     when ("W") then countw=countw+1
>>>>     otherwise         countx=countx+1; end
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 2:08 PM Bob Bridges <robhbrid...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, I wasn't complaining about the SELECT statement, only about using
>>>>> lots of DO/statement/ENDs when there's only a single statement.  I would
>>>>> code the same thing like this:
>>>>>
>>>>>   select
>>>>>     when idx="T" then countt=countt+1
>>>>>     when idx="U" then countu=countu+1
>>>>>     when idx="V" then countv=countv+1
>>>>>     when idx="W" then countw=countw+1
>>>>>     otherwise         countx=countx+1; end
>>>>>
>>>>> (Of course if that were a real example I would probably have found a
>>>>> way to use a stem variable instead:
>>>>>
>>>>>   count.idx=count.idx+1
>>>>>
>>>>> But in this case I was just talking about coding style, as Mr Metz
>>>>> said.)
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
>>>>>
>>>>> /* If a problem has a single neck, it has a simple solution. */
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
>>>>> On Behalf Of Lou Losee
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2020 14:38
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you rather code the select as a series of nested if-then-else?
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:35 PM Bob Bridges <robhbrid...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > The only language I can think of off-hand that doesn't require some
>>>>> sort
>>>>> > of END to close a DO (I'm sure there are others) is ISPF.  But, in
>>>>> REXX at
>>>>> > least, I never use single-statement DOs.  I see them all the time,
>>>>> and I
>>>>> > don't get it.  Like this:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >   if x=0 then do
>>>>> >     x=x+1
>>>>> >   end
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Or, more painfully:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >   select
>>>>> >     when idx="T" then
>>>>> >       do
>>>>> >         countt=countt+1
>>>>> >       end
>>>>> >     when idx="U" then
>>>>> >       do
>>>>> >         countu=countu+1
>>>>> >       end
>>>>> >     when idx="V" then
>>>>> >       do
>>>>> >         countv=countv+1
>>>>> >       end
>>>>> >     when idx="W" then
>>>>> >       do
>>>>> >         countw=countw+1
>>>>> >       end
>>>>> >     otherwise
>>>>> >       do
>>>>> >         countx=countx+1
>>>>> >       end
>>>>> >   end
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Why?  If it were easier to read, I might sympathize.  But it's
>>>>> harder, not
>>>>> > easier.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
>>>>> On
>>>>> > Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
>>>>> > Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2020 14:40
>>>>> >
>>>>> > But in Rexx similarly, END is required even for a single-statement
>>>>> DO.
>>>>> > Good for Rexx.  I like strong closure.
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>>>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Wayne V. Bickerdike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wayne V. Bickerdike
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Wayne V. Bickerdike
>>
>>
>
> --
> Wayne V. Bickerdike
>
>

-- 
Wayne V. Bickerdike

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to