Doesn't that mean that a configuration without CAZM is still compliant with the architecture? Also, I note that the description of prefixing in ESA/390 mode is gone. Or does the description of prefixing in ESA/390 compatibility mode also apply to ESA/390 mode?
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Jim Mulder [d10j...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 10:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM guest with old z/OS The ESA/390 information is not deleted, because PoOps-12 applies to older machines as well as newer machines. On z14 and beyond, CZAM is installed in all configurations except some VM guest configuration (to allow for CMS). Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY "Seymour J Metz" <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote on 08/03/2020 09:45:23 AM: > From: "Seymour J Metz" <sme...@gmu.edu> > To: ibm-main@listserv.ua.edu > Date: 08/03/2020 10:11 AM > Subject: Re: z/VM guest with old z/OS > > PoOps-12 lists CZAM as optional. It still has a lot of ESA > information, e.g., segment tables, and it still describes SIGP > switching into ESA/390 mode. Is that text that was supposed to have > been deleted?. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
