> When all vendor extensions fail, as a last resort, try the ANSI standard.
Which says: 5.3.4 Other_negators A configuration may have a category of characters in source programs called other_negators. Other_negators are determined by the configuration. Only the following characters represent possible characters of this category. The glyphs used to represent them in this document are also shown: – ^ circumflex accent, caret; – ¬ not sign. without specifying the code page. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2021 1:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro Regular Expression On Sat, 29 May 2021 20:15:17 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >That's why we get the big bucks. > Ah! EBCDIC belongs top the Full Employment Program for coders! On Sun, 30 May 2021 15:48:01 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> That's not cheating; > >Of course it is cheating; it's not a faithful representation of the original >program, and it may even break the code. > When all vendor extensions fail, as a last resort, try the ANSI standard. >> On LISTSERV WWW, 'C2AC'. > >I have no idea where the C2 is coming from; the AC is correct. > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1r8RtNoGC7MN4DzWahrzTCgqvQQWwTaG07pE9-yDSK7DSp1gCnjuJVB3CB_-wI6XkYuF2vMKPereGKi7n1RjDvthXeSrWtF52AlTgv1XaPWlNukYvcUT9i3jMf01xySURS9LVK_tNg5NCbSXZ08gHlNv0srsgOXjbxRblMucAu69SAf_O_4diZPm45oez_opk2AvsVSqEBeFdJC839PpZdkedd2jDBauPiomu8C1NIfR9zx0-ijmZ7-WpiDQS_AWA2YZYoI9RjlJdMqkzORLn7tBR7IPbmJjWvLCsB_msuPx5NyXlrEuhPstdSQxV8bjn9Ax_B2qLF5og-Wqo0it7FnvdxAAX78to4DY9tjoxJYppzXlWf-0WyVzxxqA5cXqh-StEM0lIf2ah2XAZk4DfmtGNrv7siYSx2QkoJd7J6DPPNQ0q1YQYQABHOgxNQNH0/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.utf8-chartable.de%2F >________________________________________ >On Su , 30 May 2021 01:03:04 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: > >>> I tate EBCDIC issue, it's a multiple code page set issue!. Pop quiz: when >>> using REXX on a PC, is ¬ 'AA'X or 'AC'X? And, yes, you can cheat and use \ >> It's uncharacteristic that you hold Windows as an exemplar. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
