On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 12:20, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: > > Sorry. Bit 0 is usually the X'01' bit in mainframe doc (other than UNIX).
I think you were right the first time. Tony H. > So is my interpretation correct? > > SMF30_USERKEYCSAUSAGE is x'02'? > > Charles > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Charles Mills > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 8:33 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Trying to understand SMF30_RAXFLAGS > > We have a client who is trying to report on user key CSA usage. He is having > trouble understanding the IBM doc, as am I. > > The SMF doc I am familiar with documents bits as X'80', X'40', etc. But the > SMF30_RAXFLAGS doc (both the APAR and the new manual) documents the bits as > Bit 0, Bit 1, etc. Usually in mainframe documentation "bit 0" refers to the > x'80' bit. But what the client is seeing is values for SMF30_RAXFLAGS of > binary 1, 2 or 3. > > Can anyone confirm my interpretation of what he is seeing that by "bit 0" > IBM means X'01', by "bit 1" they mean x'02', and so forth? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
