It is arguable that a successful phish involved on insider.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On
> Behalf Of Joe Monk
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2022 8:20 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IBM (IBM Z) , Lenovo, HPE and Huawei Servers Rank as Most
> Secure Platforms in ITIC Survey | TechChannel
> 
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize
> the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> "Given that a healthy percentage of successful attacks involves insiders,
> there
> is no way that z/OS is immune to breaches."
> 
> Umm, you may want to rethink that statement...
> 
> "Phishing and related attacks — such as smishing (phishing lures sent over
> SMS messages) and business email compromise (phishing messages sent by
> someone pretending to be a colleague or a supervisor) — was the most
> common
> primary cause of data breaches in 2021. Ransomware was not too far behind,
> and malware was the third most common cause of data breaches.At the
> current
> growth rate, ransomware attacks will pass phishing as the No. 1 root cause
> of data compromises in 2022, ITRC predicts."
> 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.darkreading.com/edge-threat-
> monitor/most-common-cause-of-data-breach-in-2021-phishing-smishing-
> bec__;!!JmPEgBY0HMszNaDT!u-
> 4fSo6TSZojRZ0IH6DKEA70HTAH9ucb8s7DxZ4NObs9gvY-
> _gQMZwf_6EQM1tkS2H_ABi0508IFBSI_$
> 
> Last I checked, Outlook doesnt run on z/OS...
> 
> Joe
> 
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 8:11 AM Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Given that a healthy percentage of successful attacks involves insiders,
> > there is no way that z/OS is immune to breaches. The best that can be said
> > is that, properly administered, it is more secure than some other platforms.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mason.gmu.edu/*smetz3__;fg!!JmPEg
> BY0HMszNaDT!u-4fSo6TSZojRZ0IH6DKEA70HTAH9ucb8s7DxZ4NObs9gvY-
> _gQMZwf_6EQM1tkS2H_ABi0507J-pmvm$
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on
> behalf
> > of Bob Bridges [robhbrid...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 7:53 PM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: IBM (IBM Z) , Lenovo, HPE and Huawei Servers Rank as Most
> > Secure Platforms in ITIC Survey | TechChannel
> >
> > Don't get me wrong: I do believe that IBM mainframes belong at the top of
> > the list for security capabilities.  But it occurs to me that if they
> > determined this by poll, then their results may be skewed by a) the belief,
> > on the part of mainframers like me, that IBM is best, and b) a reluctance
> > on the part of some corporations to report breaches even in polls that
> > claim they're anonymous.
> >
> > That said, I'm a little surprised that IBM had "fastest mean time to
> > detection (MTTD) from the onset of the attempted attack until the
> company
> > isolated and shut it down".  I know real-time reporting products are out
> > there for mainframes, but I had the impression they're not used much.
> >
> > It's also interesting, given the size of the companies that use
> > mainframes, that they also report "The least amount of monetary losses
> due
> > to a successful security hack".  Although see item b) above again.
> >
> > ---
> > Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
> >
> > /* Believe me! The secret of reaping the greatest fruitfulness and the
> > greatest enjoyment from life is to live dangerously!  -Friedrich Nietzsche
> > */
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On
> Behalf
> > Of Mark Regan
> > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2022 16:40
> >
> >
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://secure-
> web.cisco.com/1JxdfsqHGjnUuRPmN2YNUOcWs_oODuUS43Hv9Kt5RRL9WJq
> sH4-
> fcqaxAXUsKZBF9zoWi22K6jgKVsMSVPfKlDoW0UfoK79vCd9b50dV2JBh9vI68
> wnxNs7IlnkymdAD8cyIP56U6bVR040KuFDUTTuIm5pJ-Df--mvQFXgIdElA0-
> JyZ-oaTwuV5H6T-3i1K_F5DTaJAl-B3_JifnuvpwG4jUx7XVsR5-
> xort_nGKKaysCiPyiHN5-
> RFCI82FqYnnvedHtDh3gukxo4ItD6HjpJa03Rb3BLbhb4TcscdsNUrTw7SkN15BC
> eem2_sCAEqp2x9meCeTgwhIUlAe2hust6LZz92uDc81LbxklmQbXf-
> yTlzFKn0LgmFtjRFDmvIXdZoAO5ywdpP84gAyTxS6JzKVRslOJU3wNPS_MzwR
> UNAqb_qR-fApdtTNIjp76XHmE6YTBvTCfHZWq09QjxB-
> w/https*3A*2F*2Ftechchannel.com*2FEnterprise*2F04*2F2022*2Fsecure-
> platforms-itic-survey__;JSUlJSUlJQ!!JmPEgBY0HMszNaDT!u-
> 4fSo6TSZojRZ0IH6DKEA70HTAH9ucb8s7DxZ4NObs9gvY-
> _gQMZwf_6EQM1tkS2H_ABi0500L40NdP$
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to