Was there a HOLD un the PTF with an explanation that it had to be on a separate APPLY from the prereq?
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Barbara Nitz [nitz-...@gmx.net] Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 4:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMP)e >No the problem is that you can't install these particular PTFs with everything >else, they have to be performed separately via an Apply the PTF by itself with >NO Groupextend and then Apply the > remaining PTF's needed from the original Apply. This is exactly what I did when I encountered this. First apply ptf A, then ptf B that needs whatever new path or something. The problem for me has always been to identify ptf A because ptf B's holddata don't show up on the apply check. And sometimes I just had to walk through each of the ++pre's of B to find it. Cumbersome is too easy a word for this process. Regards, Barbara ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
