Charles Mills asked: >Question: what are the advantages and disadvantages of XL C/C++ 2.4.1 >W/D versus Open XL C/C++? Why might I choose to use one versus the >other?
What I got from Davids note is that the later two versions are more modern and thus more compliant with current C standards. The subtext is that IBM wants to stop maintaining it, figures maintaining a port of CLANG is cheaper/easier. Which isnt necessarily wrong, if it doesnt lose the traditional MVS side usage, as it currently does. Im faintly optimistic that continuing the same numbering means the intent is there to re-converge them. Naïve? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
