On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:28:00PM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: > I'm going for the bonus points: NJE/RJE. I was just reading on this by > accident while working on a tool to do a JES3 to JES2 migration (JOBs, not > the sysprog work, not that far into AI yet ;-) ).
UCLA/Mail (in it's day) sent and received mail from JES2 via SNA/NJE. The code is available, I don't know if it would still work. During development I had the NJE protocol book and, of course, the source to JES2. There was a "problem" with JES2 not accepting data I sent formated as the book said. I looked at the JES2 source and it was clearly not in agreement with the book. I called IBM with the disagreement between their protocol book and the JES2 code. This went nowhere as about expected. After going around a bit, my final question was (thinking that SNA/NJE was IBM's main path, and not being a JES3 shop): Well then how does JES3 do it? The answer was JES3 didn't (at that time) do SNA/NJE. I changed my code to produce something JES2 would accept... PS: Another site at UCLA was JES3. The JES3 lack of NJE was circumvented by having their UCLA/Mail connect to our JES2 via SNA. This got them both local email and email to Bitnet and the Internet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN