First off you can get as you close as you can A fault analyzer cannt be perfect but you can get close
> On Nov 28, 2023, at 1:27 PM, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: > > What are the scenarios where a CSVQUERY won't give you what you need, other > than addresses in the nucleus? > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of > Joseph Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 12:41 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Abend producing SDWARBAD > > Sam asked me to update file 192 in cbttape > > Its a generic recovery > > I’m making two > > Updates > > 1) when the error PSW isn’t in the program storage so I’m finding out if the > abend happened in a RB and then at what offset the user called that rb > 2) displaying 128 bit PSW and 64 bit gpr > If then abend occurred while the user was in amode 64 > > That’s it > >>> On Nov 28, 2023, at 12:14 PM, Jon Perryman <jperr...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 08:48:23 -0500, Joseph Reichman >>> <reichman...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Let then be specific >>> >>> The first thing I do is get the low and high address of the program The >>> program name is being passed as a parm to the Estae routine >> >> Hi Joseph, >> >> Peter asked you what is the problem you are trying to solve (not the details >> about how you are trying to solve that problem). Are you performing recovery >> where having the RB is somehow important? Are you printing diagnostic >> information where the RB contains something you think might be important? Is >> this an exercise to create an updated CBT192. >> >> I'm guessing that your company wants better diagnostic information for some >> code that your company has written. You're going after control blocks that >> don't seem to be useful and seem to be trying to handle every possible >> situation. Can you tell us what you want to accomplish instead of how you >> are trying to accomplish it? >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
