In 1981, running IMS/DB/DC TSO/SPF (not ISPF), IMS MPPs, and batch on 370/168. MVS SP 1.x.
"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." Bugs Bunny Sent from Proton Mail Android -------- Original Message -------- On 7/31/25 6:03 PM, Pommier, Rex <[email protected]> wrote: > Guess the numbers I was given so many years ago for the models 13/24 may > have been a bit off. This chart says 4.5 and 9.9 MIPS, I was told way back > it was 3.3 and 8. In either case, a really small computer (by todays > standards) to run a 400 bed hospital. > > Rex > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > Phil Smith III > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2025 10:46 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: 4381 capacity and performance > > That would explain our joy if so--we went from a 0.5MIPS Formation 4000 PCM > to a 9370 (1 MIPS?) to a 4381-1 IIRC. > > BTW, > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.roylongbottom.org.uk/mips.htm__;!!KjMRP1Ixj6eLE0Fj!p5J4NkHQq9ilopVQNEwdZhKLBuIbSA-yNk4T4bKv11rtL0rmKeOGL_GfsclRyxfzGjwO-7PkYCEgyow$ > shows MIPS including 9xE, though I expect Shmuel already saw that. > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > Pommier, Rex > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2025 10:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: 4381 capacity and performance > > From ancient memory, the model 13 was rated at 3.3 MIPS and the 24 was 8 > MIPS. They were the first 2 machines I worked on. IDK if that is > extrapolatable to the relative performance your chart shows. I don't have > documentation to verify these numbers. > > Rex > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > Seymour J Metz > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2025 9:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] 4381 capacity and performance > > Does anybody still have information on 4381 capacity and performance? I'm > trying to update the table in > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_4300*Processors__;Iw!!KjMRP1Ixj6eLE0Fj!sc4M3mw4glfrd9fmBhhs8PGbCZiVpOwijZLNtTbc5dnHYUu09TFgAm3sJOz6hyH8iWDjo7XlpnJTs-ujnw$ > >, the 4381-MG91E/MG92E announcement doesn't mention storage capacity and I > can't find the later model groups. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mason.gmu.edu/*smetz3__;fg!!KjMRP1Ixj6eLE0Fj!sc4M3mw4glfrd9fmBhhs8PGbCZiVpOwijZLNtTbc5dnHYUu09TFgAm3sJOz6hyH8iWDjo7XlpnLzyNI2MA$ > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
