On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 13:00:05 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
>>As above, there's no need. [to distinguish PDSE from PDS]
>
>That depends on what you're doing. My code for accessing multiple
>members via QSAM with a single OPEN will definitely not work for PDSE.
> 
I wonder how HLASM does it.  I don't believe it does multiple
OPENs.  Particularly needed for nested COPY statements.
>
>>1. Is PDSE the same (I mean same structure of directory and directory
>>entry) in that regard?
>
>PDSE is very different, but IBM provides mapping.
>
IBM provides a transformation rather than a mapping.

>>2. Otherwise, where can I find documentation about PDSE in the sam
>>econtext?
>
>DFSMS Using Data Sets
>
>DFSMS Macro Instruction for Data Sets
> 
These describe the Access Method interface, but say nothing
about the data format, which I believe is a trade secret.
(Well, almost nothing beyond stating that the data are stored
in 4KiB blocks of unspecified format.)

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to