On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:18:05 -0600, Ze'ev Atlas <zatl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I still think that the decision, many decades ago, to leave the actual >definition and implementation of short, int, long, etc. to the implementation >rather than enforce rules (16, 32, 64 bits) was wrong and shortsighted. I >thought so when I was introduced to C in the late nineteen eighties and I did >not find any reason to change my mind ever since. > You can always use int16_t, uint16_t, int32_t, uint32_t, int64_t, uint64_t and friends in /usr/include/stdint.h. ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
