The individual csect idea is good when products are written in Assembler of course. I wonder about products in C and C++ or COBOL. My initial question was about packaging our COBOL based product with Assembler based subroutines into a SMP/E package for delivery to the customer. My idea to make the customers install easier and ad void as many errors as possible, thus eliminating support calls. Everyone's input is great ...but is my thinking incorrect here ?.
Regards, Scott www.idmwork.com On Sunday, September 13, 2015, Ed Gould <edgould1...@comcast.net> wrote: > On Sep 13, 2015, at 8:16 AM, Mike Schwab wrote: > >> >>> >> A minimal consistent set of patches would require: One member contains >> the overall PTF level. Every PTF verifies for the previous PTF and >> updates it. Instead of zapping all members with the PTF even if not >> changed. >> > > Mike Maybe you don't remember the SU string? It wasn't fun. > > Ed > >> >> >> -- >> Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA >> Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
