On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:57:46 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 03:06:10 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: >> >>Is there another process that could be used to identify the OLDEST GDG for >>Input >>and then delete that GDG? Or is there another way to handle this situation? >>I >>was going to see if the LISTC could be faster than CSI. >> Naively, I'd expect that LISTCAT use CSI, or something very similar.
>For CSI, I find a SHARE presentation about a year old: > https://share.confex.com/share/122/webprogram/Session14633.html > >Which mentions SYS1.SAMPLIB(IGGCSIRX). Trying that, it returns GDG bases >but not members. Or I don't know enough about catalogs to supply the >correct filters. > Looking further at: z/OS 2.1.0>z/OS DFSMS>z/OS DFSMS Managing Catalogs>Catalog Search Interface User's Guide>Selection Criteria Fields z/OS DFSMS Managing Catalogs SC23-6853-00 ... the field descriptions seem to be garbled. I see: 132(84) Character 1 CSIDTYPS Entry types to be returned. All types = blanks ... one character. But in the detail below, I see: CSIDTYPS, Entry Types ... The valid types can be mixed and in any order. Blanks cannot separate the types. For instance, “ABH” might be specified to get only the non-VSAM, generation data group and generation data set entries. ... multiple characters. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
