Paul Gilmartin wrote: >RECEIVE is extraordinarily ill-suited to automation: >o The user has no a priori control over which spool file will be RECEIVEd. >o The user must be present to reply to a prompt.
That is very true. JES2 simply gives to you what it seemed to be the first. I could not find the reason/algorithm for how RECEIVE and JES2 decide what to present to the receiver. I recommend using FTP instead of XMIT/RECEIVE for another reason - Speed and no filling up of JES2 spool. >TSO developers (are there any such?) would do well to learn from CMS. >How about: RECEIVE [JOB(jobID[.dsid])] [REPLY('reply-string')] Well, ask IBM [formally of course]! Perhaps they can review your suggestion. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN