In <1784726748839781.wa.paulgboulderaim....@listserv.ua.edu>, on
11/23/2015
   at 03:51 PM, Paul Gilmartin
<0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> said:

>I heartily agree.  Mr. Natural sez, 
>"Use the right tool for the job."

The shell is not the right tool.

>One suggestion used LISTDS, DFSORT, and IDCAMS.
>I was aghast at its complexity. 

And yet you're doing essentially the same thing. Even if your IDCAMS
is backlevel, you can do a fast delete all with PDS from the CBT tape,
as was discussed here.

>I was aghast at its complexity.  Here's a simpler alternative

I'm aghast at its complexity. There are cases where the shell might be
the right tool; this is not one.
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to