>Make sure that you have your systrace set at maximum, then (not the default >64K, and even 1MB will not be enough, especially on a busy system).
I had a look at the size recently but can't remember what it was right now. But I remember It to be of decent size. >Did you get the same set of insufficient dump data? Just for comparison - were >the same addresses involved? Yes, there seems to be some consistency. It was the same NSI address in the PSW in some dumps I lokked at. >Admittedly we never specified RE=11 (or mode=pp) on the slip trap we had >attempted for an 0C4 in my last job, but the slip trap on OC4 only prodcued a >dump when TRAP was set to OFF. Maybe what interfered was the fact that parts >of the code were authorized. Maybe Peter's "middleware infrastructure" is also >authorized, at least in parts. Nothing authorizied involved. What I call "middleware" here is just a bunch of Cobol and Assembler routines that have to be CALLed by application code to perform such basic things as opening, reading, writing, closing data sets. I don't know much about it yet; too new to the company. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN