>Make sure that you have your systrace set at maximum, then (not the default 
>64K, and even 1MB will not be enough, especially on a busy system).

I had a look at the size recently but can't remember what it was right now. But 
I remember It to be of decent size.



>Did you get the same set of insufficient dump data? Just for comparison - were 
>the same addresses involved?

Yes, there seems to be some consistency. It was the same NSI address in the PSW 
in some dumps I lokked at.





>Admittedly we never specified RE=11 (or mode=pp) on the slip trap we had 
>attempted for an 0C4 in my last job, but the slip trap on OC4 only prodcued a 
>dump when TRAP was set to OFF. Maybe what interfered was the fact that parts 
>of the code were authorized. Maybe Peter's "middleware infrastructure" is also 
>authorized, at least in parts.




Nothing authorizied involved. What I call "middleware" here is just a bunch of 
Cobol and Assembler routines that have to be CALLed by application code to 
perform such basic things as opening, reading, writing, closing data sets. I 
don't know much about it yet; too new to the company.


--
Peter Hunkeler



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to