STC, so sort of batch. Not UNIX command line, but POSIX(ON) and dubbed. > almost anything else asking for more memory could fail, couldn't it?
Yes, in my model of how this works, LE GETMAINs a bunch of storage for heap. When I do a new, it sub-allocates from that heap. If the heap is exhausted LE does another GETMAIN. Lather, rinse, repeat. When storage is gone, it's gone, pretty much no matter who you are. I'm not sure *exactly* what the reserved storage is used for. What is the "trigger" or "authorization" for a particular request to be able to be satisfied from the reserved storage? Is that where the failed load is attempting to get its storage from? I am going to guess not, so reserving a megabyte won't make any difference. Maybe. And yes, exactly, I meant CEE3DMP(). Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Bill Woodger Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 8:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CEEDUMP possible following 'new' failure Non-batch, I assume. Whilst your "news" are sucking up memory, almost anything else asking for more memory could fail, couldn't it? Not just one of yours? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
