So, when will CEE.SCEELPA be z/OS standard? :) > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Jim Mulder > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 10:48 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: CEEDUMP possible following 'new' failure > > > The remaining problem is that I am not getting any diagnostic > information, > > in other words, exactly *which* new failed -- which will of course > > make > any > > bug of this sort in the field hard to find. I call CEEDUMP to get a > > call trace and it produces an *empty* four-line dataset. On the > > console I get > > > > IEW4000I FETCH FOR MODULE CEEMENU3 FROM DDNAME *VLF* FAILED > BECAUSE > > INSUFFICIENT STORAGE WAS AVAILABLE. > > CSV031I LIBRARY ACCESS FAILED FOR MODULE CEEMENU3, RETURN CODE > 24, > REASON > > CODE 26080021, DDNAME *LNKLST* > > I would suggest putting the CEEDUMP-related modules in LPA. Our > intention in z/OS is that modules involved in the production of > SYSABEND/SYSUDUMP/SYSMDUMP/IEATDUMP/SDUMP > should be in LPA, so that they don't need get loaded into exhausted REGION- > constrained storage while trying to take a dump of REGION-constrained > storage exhaustion. (And I say "our intention" > because we do sometimes find cases where we did not do what we > intended). > > Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. > Poughkeepsie NY > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
