Ah! Most excellent. Thank you. Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jim Mulder Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 10:48 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CEEDUMP possible following 'new' failure > The remaining problem is that I am not getting any diagnostic information, > in other words, exactly *which* new failed -- which will of course > make any > bug of this sort in the field hard to find. I call CEEDUMP to get a > call trace and it produces an *empty* four-line dataset. On the > console I get > > IEW4000I FETCH FOR MODULE CEEMENU3 FROM DDNAME *VLF* FAILED BECAUSE > INSUFFICIENT STORAGE WAS AVAILABLE. > CSV031I LIBRARY ACCESS FAILED FOR MODULE CEEMENU3, RETURN CODE 24, REASON > CODE 26080021, DDNAME *LNKLST* I would suggest putting the CEEDUMP-related modules in LPA. Our intention in z/OS is that modules involved in the production of SYSABEND/SYSUDUMP/SYSMDUMP/IEATDUMP/SDUMP should be in LPA, so that they don't need get loaded into exhausted REGION-constrained storage while trying to take a dump of REGION-constrained storage exhaustion. (And I say "our intention" because we do sometimes find cases where we did not do what we intended). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
