Another vote for MacKinney's JQP. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 9:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] [External Sender] Re: LRS VPS Printer Replacment
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Carroll, William < carro...@grangeinsurance.com> wrote: > Another vote for NPF. I have the same exact situation as Dana. Works > well. We do CICS , Mainframe, Network, printing all through the same > devices. Not one issue for over 2 years. > I got NPF working and it did well. However, it was (is still?) hard to administer. So hard that the VTAM person (we actually still had SNA 3270 nodes via Visara controllers) decided that it was unacceptable. We went with MacKinney's JQP. It was easier to administer than NPF (but not as easy as VPS); reliable (we still use it); and relatively inexpensive. > > Bill > > -- I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
