On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:50:46 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote: >On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 23:27:35 +0000, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > >>I thought that if PTF A was superseded by B, and B superseded >>by C, then SMPE would only install only C and mark A and B as >>SUP'D. That logic, if it obtains, always made sense to me. > >That is correct. And there is no need to apply A or B if you plan >to apply C. But there should be no harm in specifying all three in >the apply. If it doesn't work, at least one of the PTFs must be >incorrectly constructed. > Does the check for whether a SUPerseding PTF correctly replaces all elements operate if the putatively SUPerseded PTF is merely RECEIVED, not necessarily APPLYed?
--gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
