So when I look at the compiler options, they have DATA(31) ALL31 in LE is OFF
Only things I can think of for now. Lizette > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of > Steve Thompson > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 7:10 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol > above the line? > > DATA(24) may be their problem. But, you can’t change it if csects are > statically linked that are RMODE 24. > > I’m fixing some issues like this now for ENT COBOL 4.2 where I work. The > routines are ALC..... > > Sent from my iPhone — small keyboarf, fat fungrs, stupd spell manglr. Expct > mistaks > > > > On Jan 24, 2019, at 8:06 PM, Lizette Koehler <stars...@mindspring.com> > wrote: > > > > A friend of mine is having a bit of problem with a Cobol program. WS > > is about 7M in size below the line. This creates the perfect > > environment for S878-10 abends. > > > > Is there a compiler option that would move WS above the line? Or is > > there a different solution. If there is an option, what level of > > Cobol did it show up in? > > > > > > No, I do not know what they are doing. But I am told they cannot > > change the code. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Lizette Koehler > > statistics: A precise and logical method for stating a half-truth > > inaccurately > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
