Also ask them to look at the file buffers.

If VSAM files are used, AMP='RMODE31=ALL' on each DD will move control blocks 
and buffers above the line.


Check to see that files are not excessively buffered or if the specified 
buffers can be reduced a bit to free storage.


On sequential DDs with low EXCP activity, try reducing buffers on those with 
something lower than the system default like BUFNO=1, 2 or 3.


Alan


________________________________
From: "Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)" <thomas.sa...@fiserv.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 20:25
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol above 
the line?

DATA(31) - allocates working storage above-the-line 
DATA(24) - allocates working storage below-the-line 

ALL31 being OFF - is probably what is needed in a mixed  environment. 
ALL31 being ON - would say that you have no below-the-line programs for COBOL 
to deal with. 


Thanks, 

Tom Savor 
-----Original Message----- 
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Lizette Koehler 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 9:42 PM 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol above 
the line? 

So when I look at the compiler options, they have DATA(31) 

ALL31 in LE is OFF 

Only things I can think of for now. 

Lizette 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN 


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to