Also ask them to look at the file buffers.
If VSAM files are used, AMP='RMODE31=ALL' on each DD will move control blocks and buffers above the line. Check to see that files are not excessively buffered or if the specified buffers can be reduced a bit to free storage. On sequential DDs with low EXCP activity, try reducing buffers on those with something lower than the system default like BUFNO=1, 2 or 3. Alan ________________________________ From: "Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)" <thomas.sa...@fiserv.com> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 20:25 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol above the line? DATA(31) - allocates working storage above-the-line DATA(24) - allocates working storage below-the-line ALL31 being OFF - is probably what is needed in a mixed environment. ALL31 being ON - would say that you have no below-the-line programs for COBOL to deal with. Thanks, Tom Savor -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 9:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol above the line? So when I look at the compiler options, they have DATA(31) ALL31 in LE is OFF Only things I can think of for now. Lizette ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN