Reading Railroad, the one that does not go past GO.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of 
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 1:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DASD nostalgia

[External Email]

> They had three 3211 disk drives

What train did you use on your disk drives? <g, d & r>

> hardware check

Yeah, DANCE got those on the Memorex drives, but I don't know whether there was 
ever an issue with normal seek patterns.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Ray 
Pearce <ray.pea...@macro4.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DASD nostalgia

That reminds me of an incident in my first ever job on a 360/25 They had three 
3211 disk drives and were running a large tape to tape sort with work files 
spread across two of the disks.
In the middle of the sort a disk had a hardware check. Engineer came, reset the 
disk but no fault was found. Re-started the machine and ran the job again. At 
the exact same point in the job the disk checked again.
Engineer came back and watched as the job ran - the heads on the two drives 
were seeking back and forth so much that both drive units were rocking slightly 
and at the critical point the two boxes clashed and bingo.
The solution was to move the drives quarter of an inch further apart.

Ray Pearce

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: 23 July 2019 17:35
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DASD nostalgia

Nothing as drastic as the alleged FastRand, but I can vouch for 3330 and 
3330-equivalent drives dancing. My boss told me to write a program that started 
at the middle of the pack and then did seeks in and out to the first untouched 
cylinder until it had hit every cylinder. I told him that the timings from the 
test would have no relevance to performance in the wild, but he insisted that I 
write it anyway.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


--
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by Google Message Security and 
the UNICOM Global security systems. This message is for the named person's use 
only. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and notify the 
sender.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
FIRST TENNESSEE

Confidentiality notice: 
This e-mail message, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged 
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or 
the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or 
copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this 
e-mail message from your computer.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to