I hear rumors that there is a significant bug in z/VM 5.2 that will be fixed in 
z/VM 5.3. It is another 2G line constraint having to do with page and segment 
tables having to be located in the underworld.

Regards,
Richard Schuh


> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Stracka, James (GTI)
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:50 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Rumors of the next z/VM?
> 
> 
> Good luck with that as I cannot get IBM to say when RSU0602 might be
> available for z/VM 5.2.0!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Romanowski, John (OFT)
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 1:47 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Rumors of the next z/VM?
> 
> 
> Due to some precarious applications, a customer is anxious to know now
> what release/version of z/VM we're migrating them to in 2007.  
> We'll migrate them before their VM5.1 is unsupported in 9/2007. Does
> anyone have any good rumors about whether a new release or version of
> z/VM beyond VM5.2 will become available in 2007?
> --------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential, 
> privileged
> or otherwise legally protected. It is intended only for the addressee.
> If you received this e-mail in error or from someone who was not
> authorized to send it to you, do not disseminate, copy or 
> otherwise use
> this e-mail or its attachments.  Please notify the sender 
> immediately by
> reply e-mail and delete the e-mail from your system.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please 
> notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, 
> print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here 
> for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.     
> http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 

Reply via email to