On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:23:53 -0400, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip discussion of alternate DDR modification> I understand your goal now. >I just want IBM to spend their development money to get us the biggest >bang for the buck. I think that having the I/O from DDR as something we >can get our hands on with other tools would give us a LOT more options. I don't want to ask for something so big that it gets shelved as a non- starter. Adding DDR support for a tape management system (eg. via calls from CMS DDR to DMSTVS/DMSTVI is much more tractable, more likely to get done, and quite probably of greater value to sites that rely on DDR instead of a 3rd party solution. Brian Nielsen
