Nick Laflamme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Fortunately, IBM makes it easy for us to define new command classes so >we can do it our way. If I were feeling demanding, I might whine about >IBM (and other vendors) listing command classes they want instead of >commands (and DIAGs) they want, but I'm not, so.... :-)
Some of us had it beaten into our heads early (by having been IN shops with commands moved around among classes) to document "Requires Class A for CP FORCE, XAUTOLOG, and SHUTDOWN" and like'a'dat, but yeah, I've seen other vendors who don't do so well... ...phsiii