Rich -
Thanks for replying, In zLinux is there away to build tolerance
like any setting to say try 'x' amount of times before taking the error or
is that all under the covers?
Thanks
Andy
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> wrote on
10/30/2007 02:15:06 PM:
> Andy,
>
> That's probably going to depend upon what lives on 9DA1. If it's a root
> filesystem or (gasp) a swap disk, then it's probably fair to say Linux
> may throw in the towel. But the z/VM messages don't tell the whole
> story, /var/log/messages may have more info. But as I say, if it's the
> root filesystem it may not be able to write the messages, then there's a
> vicious cycle and boom!
>
> I'd say check into what's causing the IFCC problems.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > My background is z/OS so please excuse me....
> >
> > Question:
> > We have recently taken many hits (paths being lost, chip,ids
etc
> > see below) for some of our DASD which z/VM sits on and Redhat, we are
> > looking into why. Each time we take such a hit we have lost different
> > instances of zLinux. Now I understand the concept the OS z/Vm does the
> > I/O and recovery through MIH etc. I am to assume then Redhat or SUSE
any
> > linux running under z/VM is dependant on the operating system for
> > recovery. So it normal when taking a hit like the one below to loose a
> > zLinux instance?
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the
intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information, or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
intended addressee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
message.
