And, sometimes indeed a colorful/fontful answer is much nicer to read, that pleads for HTML mails.
2007/12/11, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Dec 11, 2007 8:50 AM, Wayne T Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > individual items is much faster. I've used gmail (gmail uses keywords > > in place of folders) this way for over a year now, and am very happy > > with it. Gmail's recent addition of IMAP support means that I can have > > my gmail not only in a web browser, but in my Outlook, Thunderbird or > > other e-mail client that supports IMAP. > > I certainly recommend using gmail to follow mailing lists in > non-digest form. The web interface is highly efficient when you're > able to be connected while reading mail. When viewing the posts, gmail > will hides the quoted sections and thus reduces the amount of text to > skip through. The posts are organized into threads again so it is easy > to put aside the remainder of a subject you don't care to follow (but > you will be able to find it back). > > With over 5 GB of email storage for free, you don't have to retire in > 3 years... :-) Added bonus is that you see advertising in the margin > that is often related to the post in a funny way (I wasn't aware of > IPL devices for skin treatment, and I get a lot of links to off-shore > plumbing equipment). > > Rob > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
