On Friday, 12/14/2007 at 12:40 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The USE and MENU options don?t get around the problem of the tiny input 
area.

On my z/VM 5.3 system I have 9 characters.  But this issue with large 
disks threatens to get out of hand.  Apparently the word isn't getting 
around that it is time to start scaling these large numbers on displays 
unless specifically asked for details.  99.999% of the time, I only care 
about the relative scale of file sizes.  Knowing a file has 45K records is 
just as good as knowing it has 44,727 records.  I'm just looking for the 
big ones to throw away.

Naturally LISTFILE shouldn't do the scaling, but FILELIST and FLIST 
should.  Sorting can still work by the unseen real number.  If one does a 
Sort-by-Size operation, THEN the real number is shown and some non-size 
related field disappears.  All assuming, of course, that my 90 column 
screen can't accomodate the whole thing.  (FLIST reverts to 24x80 on my 
40x90 screen.)

I have been ready for years to stop reformatting data to accomodate 80 
columns.  Back when we used Real 3270s, that was an issue.  No longer.  It 
is time to take a bold step forward into the 1990s.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott

Reply via email to