And maybe extract the comment via QUERY MDISK?

On 11/02/2008, Ivica Brodaric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 5. Make the syntax similar to the one in SYSTEM CONFIG6. Integrate it into
> SYSTEM CONFIG via INCLUDE and keep the source directory on PARM disks.
> 7. Define the DRCT space in SYSTEM CONFIG the way warmstart and checkpoint
> areas are
> 8. Provide compile/nocompile option or a checkpointing system that would
> not compile the directory at every IPL but would if the system is brought up
> on a disaster recovery site.
>
> I could go on. That would be NICE. But that would be quite a sweeping
> change. I was arguing for a special comment statement just for MDISK because
> I think that is the statement that cries for comment option the most. If I
> ever put any comment into the directory, then if it is not to do with the
> userid itself (which is already catered for by "*") it is most likely to do
> with MDISK. I would also like the minidisk comment statement to immediately
> precede MDISK, not follow it. Plus your ideas 2 and 3. I would like the
> comment to be query-able. I can imagine many situations where it would be
> very useful and reassuring.
>
>
> Ivica Brodaric
>
> On 11/02/2008, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, 02/09/2008 at 01:15 EST, Ivica Brodaric
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How about adding COMMENT parameter in MDISKOPT? Or even MDISKC
> > statement? Yes,
> > > it would reduce vertical readability, but there is not much space in
> > the
> > MDISK
> > > statement and if you introduce asterisk, semicolon, or any other
> > character as a
> > > start of comment, you'd have to make sure you don't have any passwords
> > that
> > > look just like that. And if you use ESM that does password encryption,
> > you
> > > might have a password that in encrypted form looks like asterisk.
> >
> > If you're going to propose changes in directory syntax, why not go all
> > the
> > way?
> >
> > 1. Add a COMMENT statement that applies to the most-recently encountered
> > non-COMMENT statement
> > 2. Compile it into the object directory
> > 3. Provide a way to extract the comment (e.g. QUERY VIRT 190 DETAILS)
> > 4. Eliminate the F 80 requirement.
> >
> > Alan Altmark
> > z/VM Development
> > IBM Endicott
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to