Some entries in one of my systems are more than 23 years old. The lack
of a year makes this date/time stamp irrelevant. A separate transaction
audit log would be much better and archivable.
/Tom Kern
RPN01 wrote:
You can get rid of them.... But DirMaint is just going to put them right
back again when you replace the user. :-)
If it's a modification date, it doesn't contain a year, which, on
longer-term systems, would become useless. It'd be like saying "It changed
Wednesday." Also, the DirMaint DVHOPT record has a different "line number"
than the rest of the entry.
