Yes, but an experiment using those areas does not necessarily translate
to renaming of a spool volume. It would seem reasonable that renaming
would be OK, but it doesn't hurt to hear it from the Oracle.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
________________________________
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Bates
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:29 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CPOWNED Devices
I don't believe that will cause any problems. I've done it
recently with the checkpoint and warm start areas (renamed the volume
they are on) and was able to come up without a problem and find all my
spool files. As long as the volumes remain in the same slots, you should
be fine.
Bob Bates
Enterprise Hosting Services - Enterprise Virtualization - z/VM
and z/Linux
<http://ehs.homestead.wellsfargo.com/Mainframe/zSS/zSE/zVM-zLinux/Pages/
default.aspx>
w. (469)892-6660
c. (214) 907-5071
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this
for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action
based on this message or any information herein. If you have received
this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply
e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."
________________________________
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 2:59 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: CPOWNED Devices
Will it kill spool if I
1. Reliable a spool disk and
2. Chnge the entry in the cpowned list, replacing the old volser
with the new?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
