On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:51:21 -0500, Bill Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
========================= ========================= ==================== > >Yes, I did saw that and meant to respond but forgot. The current suppor t >does not include dynamic increase for xstore. That's an interesting >argument for considering it (that dynamically added xstore could then be >more easily dynamically detached, which is certainly true enough). I'm not >how widely applicable that support would be nor far that would go toward s >addressing Richard's needs, though. Still, it would allow them to make some >sort of use of the otherwise idle storage. > >- Bill Holder, z/VM Development, IBM Ooops - Next to last sentence should read: "I'm not >>sure<< how....". - Bill Holder, z/VM Development, IBM
