On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 12:50 EDT, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ah, one of the Great Schisms. See the 3rd from the last paragraph in the > > description of *MSG in the CP Programming Services book: > > What troubles me is that the folks in IBM who push the new automated > operator product seem to have missed this part of their education. > Apparently the documentation suggests that you can simply set secuser > all over the place to manage virtual machines. And as we know this > breaks the ability for the victim to process *MSG.
I'll have to let someone who has factual knowledge of the product answer that question. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
