You're saying a vendor should update their product just to accommodate
service updates to some other critical portion of the infrastructure?
Come on, David... that's just crazy talk. ;-)
Bad Vendor. No biscuit!!!
-dan.
David Boyes wrote:
Background:
Upgrading a system to current level. Have a vendor product that
insists on the installation of a backlevel component application that
causes the configuration and service management system to report
errors in the configuration. Vendor insists that the backlevel
component is the only way, but the errors cause problems with future
upgrades and overall configuration management by reporting false
positives when checked for whether the system is up to date and has
all service applied.
Question:
I believe the maker of the vendor product is in error here. Am I wrong?
-- db
