If I remember the story correctly, you won't see a version such as 6.0, because in IBM wisdom, this would imply that there would be following releases (due to the decimal). Now why it's ok to have 6.1, and why that doesn't carry the same implication, I don't know.
-- Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation .~. RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW /V\ 507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\ ----- ^^-^^ "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different." On 7/8/09 6:50 AM, "Phil Smith III" <li...@akphs.com> wrote: > Mike Walter wrote: > <snip> >> For that matter, z/VM Version 6.1? What happened to Version 6.0? Doesn't >> everyone know that odd-numbered versions are considered unlucky? > > Can't have Version 6 Release 0 ... ya know? > > ...phsiii
