On Monday, 07/13/2009 at 04:28 EDT, Colin Allinson <cgallin...@amadeus.com> wrote: > Yes, the move to SYSPROF was a good idea but it is a pity it didn't go just > that one step further to keep IBM function and any local customisation > separate.
FWIW, I can't find a Requirement for this in the requirements database. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
