No, not at all, that's not what I was saying; what you propose would obviously be an exposure. A privileged user (operations staff) can issue
that today. Putting a loaded gun in the hands of a class G user is not a t all the same thing. Anything a user at a keyboard can do, a guest progra m can do, generally, and they all have to be protected. On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:23:11 -0700, P S <zosw...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Bill Holder <hold...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> I don't entirely agree. The action of the guest did not cause harm >> to CP, it was the action of the operations staff which did. This >> is not a denial of service case that I can see. > >Hm. So by that rationale, we can make STORE H class G, because it >won't be the *guest* harming CP, it will be the end-user who types the >command.
