On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 15:53, Paul.Raulerson wrote: > Don't know what you consider a lot, but as of right now, I am pretty well > convinced that > there is a bug, and a rather nasty one at that, in the LVM code. > > Do you do much adding and/or removal of DASD to your Linux instances? If > not, it would be > interesting to hear what happens when you do try to add additional DASD to > the Linux guest, > and from there on into the LVM. > > Perhaps it is human error. The question is where? :) > > -Paul >
I can't resist: it is definately human error. But whose error? The likelihood that it is a hardware failure is so remote as to be impossible. Especially if it is repeatable. "To err is human. To really mess up requires a computer." -- John McKown Maranatha!
