right - or late for dinner ;-) On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Schuh, Richard <rsc...@visa.com> wrote:
> There are some people who use "full-pack" to refer to either, which is > not really correct or good. (I have been trying for 12+ years to convince > the people here that what they are running is not VPARS. but TPF. It is > difficult to change a culture.) If there is some ingrained term at your > site, you may be better off using it. > > Since there is no official term for the mdisk defined from 1-end in the > lexicon, you are pretty much free to call it what you want. Just don't make > it George. > > > Regards, > Richard Schuh > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] *On > Behalf Of *Scott Rohling > *Sent:* Friday, June 18, 2010 2:06 PM > *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > *Subject:* what is a 'full pack' minidisk? > > Are there different terms for a minidisk that is defined from 1-END as > opposed to 0-END ? I keep having to clarify which I mean every time I use > the phrase 'full pack minidisk'. > > Is there a more succinct way to refer to them separately so I don't have to > parenthetically explain what I mean? (1-END) > > Thanks from a befuddled old man .. > > Scott Rohling > >
