No - from what you showed - the 'COMMAND COMPLETE' indicates that CP SET
VSWITCH was actually issued.   There is no CMS SET VSWITCH  -- it would have
failed with 'invalid operand' or something.

It 'is' good practice to use Address Command -- but that's a red herring
here, I think.

Scott Rohling


On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:38 PM, George Henke/NYLIC <
george_he...@newyorklife.com> wrote:

>
> So I guess what you telling me, Tom,  is  that . . .
>
> Though the XAUTOLOG's have no CMS synonyms and work in my AUTOLOG1 EXEC
> without the ADDRESS COMMAND or even the CP prefix, it is not good form.
>
> But the CP SET VSWITCH, being synonymous with the CMS SET command, does not
> get recognized as a CP command even though it has the CP prefix.
>
> The CP prefix is not enough.
>
> It needs the ADDRESS COMMAND mode set in addition to the CP prefix.
>
>
>
>
>
>  *Tom Huegel <tehue...@gmail.com>*
> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
>
> 11/02/2010 05:28 PM
>  Please respond to
> The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
>
>   To
> IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> cc
>   Subject
> Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
>
>
>
>
>
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP SET VSWITCH VSWITCH1 GRANT ZLINUX1
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP SET VSWITCH VSWITCH1 GRANT ZLINUX2
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP SET VSWITCH VSWITCH1 GRANT ZLINUX3
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP SET VSWITCH VSWITCH1 GRANT ZLINXU4..
> ..
>
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG DTCVSW1 SYNC   < OK this does sort of wait..
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG TCPIP
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG ZLINUX1
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG ZLINUX2
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG ZLINUX3
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG ZLINUX4
> ..
> ..
> ..
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG VMRMSVM
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG CMSRUN
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP XAUTOLOG WAKEUP
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:56 PM, George Henke/NYLIC <*
> george_he...@newyorklife.com* <george_he...@newyorklife.com>> wrote:
>
> Tom
>
> Would you be so kind as to send me a copy of your AUTOLOG1 EXEC?
>
> If I use it as a model, I should be ok.
>
>
>
>   *Tom Huegel <**tehue...@gmail.com* <tehue...@gmail.com>*>*
> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> <*ib...@listserv.uark.edu*<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
> >
>
> 11/02/2010 03:52 PM
>
>
>   Please respond to
>
> The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> <*ib...@listserv.uark.edu*<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
> >
>
>   To
> *ib...@listserv.uark.edu* <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
> cc
>   Subject
> Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
>
>
>
>
>
> I have my VSWITCHES defined in the SYSTEM CONFIG file and all of the
> ADDRESS COMMAND CP SET VSWITCH VSWITCH1 GRANT vmuserid's in AUTOLOG1,
> followed immediatly by XAUTOLOG LINUX1... LINUX2 ... LINUX etc.
> SUSE 10 SP2 ..
> I have no CP SLEEP commands and never had a problem.
> For what it's worth I do not connect my TCPIP to a VSWITCH.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) <*
> terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov* <terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov>> wrote:
> Ok, my point was that you would not be able to connect the network and if
> you can’t connect to the network having the VSWICTH defined does not mean
> much at least not for me.
>
>
>
> *Thank You,*
>
> * *
>
> *Terry Martin*
>
> *Lockheed Martin - Citic*
>
> *z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support*
>
> *Office - 443 348-2102*
>
> *Cell - 443 632-4191*
>
>
>
> *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:*ib...@listserv.uark.edu*<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>]
> *On Behalf Of *Miguel Delapaz*
> Sent:* Tuesday, November 02, 2010 1:51 PM *
>
> To:* *ib...@listserv.uark.edu* <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
>
> *Subject:* Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
>
>
>
> In that case, the guest should still be able to connect to the VSWITCH
> without an issue. It just won't have access to the physical network. The
> controller virtual machines have nothing to do with general VSWITCH
> operation...they are simply there to manage the OSAs that may be attached to
> the VSWITCH.
>
> Regards,
> Miguel Delapaz
> z/VM Development
>
>
> The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> <*ib...@listserv.uark.edu*<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>>
> wrote on 11/02/2010 10:45:33 AM:
>
> >
> > Ok, they may be defined but try having a z/Linux guest connect to
> > them before DTCVSW*  is up!
> >
> > Thank You,
> >
> > Terry Martin
> > Lockheed Martin - Citic
> > z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support
> > Office - 443 348-2102
> > Cell - 443 632-4191
> >
> > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> > [*mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu*<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>]
>
> > On Behalf Of Riedel, Alexander
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 1:33 PM
> > To: *ib...@listserv.uark.edu* <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
> > Subject: AW: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
> >
> > Sorry Terry, but i think you are wrong. I define my 4 VSWITCHES all
> > in the SYSTEM CONFIG and it works. At this time the TCPIP or DTCVSW*
> > are definitely not started.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Alexander Riedel
>
>

Reply via email to