If using ADDRESS COMMAND makes a difference, the most common cause is that you've got a CP EXEC somewhere on a minidisk accessed by AUTOLOG1. SYNONYMs and SET IMPCP can influence command execution too with ADDRESS CMS (or PIPE CMS), but occur less often.
You could read lesson 3 in our Telecourse (free, selfstudy): http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/descript.cgi?TCVM1 2010/11/2 George Henke/NYLIC <george_he...@newyorklife.com> > > Tom: > > *I think you may have found the problem.* > > *You use ADDRESS COMMAND CP SET VSWITCH.* > > *I do not reset the REXX CMS ENVIRONMENT to the COMMAND ENVIRONMENT with > ADDRESS COMMAND.* > > Normally that is not a problem for CP commands, but in this case SET is > also a CMS command and without the ADDRESS COMMAND prefix it may be getting > processed as a CMS SET command, instead of a CP SET VSWITCH command and so > the GRANTS may never really be getting issued even though they appear to be, > they get Command Completed. > > From AUTOLOG1 Console, last IPL: > > * 68 *-* 'CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX1'* > >>> "CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX1" > *Command complete* > 69 *-* 'CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX2' > >>> "CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX2" > Command complete > 70 *-* 'CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX3' > >>> "CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX3" > Command complete > 71 *-* 'CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX4' > >>> "CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX4" > Command complete > 72 *-* 'CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX5' > >>> "CP SET VSWITCH LNXVSW1 GRANT VLINUX5" > Command complete > > *Without the ADDRESS COMMAND prefix could it be that the GRANTS are being > ignored even though they have the CP prefix.* > > *What do you think?* > > > > *Tom Huegel <tehue...@gmail.com>* > Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> > > 11/02/2010 03:52 PM > Please respond to > The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> > > To > IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > cc > Subject > Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity > > > > > I have my VSWITCHES defined in the SYSTEM CONFIG file and all of the > ADDRESS COMMAND CP SET VSWITCH VSWITCH1 GRANT vmuserid's in AUTOLOG1, > followed immediatly by XAUTOLOG LINUX1... LINUX2 ... LINUX etc. > SUSE 10 SP2 .. > I have no CP SLEEP commands and never had a problem. > For what it's worth I do not connect my TCPIP to a VSWITCH. > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) <* > terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov* <terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov>> wrote: > Ok, my point was that you would not be able to connect the network and if > you can’t connect to the network having the VSWICTH defined does not mean > much at least not for me. > > > > *Thank You,* > > * * > > *Terry Martin* > > *Lockheed Martin - Citic* > > *z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support* > > *Office - 443 348-2102* > > *Cell - 443 632-4191* > > > > *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:*ib...@listserv.uark.edu*<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>] > *On Behalf Of *Miguel Delapaz* > Sent:* Tuesday, November 02, 2010 1:51 PM > * > To:* *ib...@listserv.uark.edu* <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> > > *Subject:* Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity > > > > In that case, the guest should still be able to connect to the VSWITCH > without an issue. It just won't have access to the physical network. The > controller virtual machines have nothing to do with general VSWITCH > operation...they are simply there to manage the OSAs that may be attached to > the VSWITCH. > > Regards, > Miguel Delapaz > z/VM Development > > > The IBM z/VM Operating System > <*ib...@listserv.uark.edu*<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>> > wrote on 11/02/2010 10:45:33 AM: > > > > > Ok, they may be defined but try having a z/Linux guest connect to > > them before DTCVSW* is up! > > > > Thank You, > > > > Terry Martin > > Lockheed Martin - Citic > > z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support > > Office - 443 348-2102 > > Cell - 443 632-4191 > > > > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > > [*mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu*<IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>] > > > On Behalf Of Riedel, Alexander > > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 1:33 PM > > To: *ib...@listserv.uark.edu* <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> > > Subject: AW: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity > > > > Sorry Terry, but i think you are wrong. I define my 4 VSWITCHES all > > in the SYSTEM CONFIG and it works. At this time the TCPIP or DTCVSW* > > are definitely not started. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Alexander Riedel > > -- Kris Buelens, IBM Belgium, VM customer support
