Raymond,

will give it a try on both z/OS guests and report back.


Thank you.



Andre



En réponse à Raymond Noal <raymond.n...@emc.com> :
> ------------------ Début du message d'origine --------------------
> 
> Andre,
> 
> You may want to consider changing the value for the HOLD to a
> lower number, say
> 10 or so. You can use the $T MASDEF command to do this while
> you are running.
> Issue the command to all members of the MAS.
> 
> Raymond E. Noal
> 
>            EMC²
>     where information lives
> 
> Phone: (508) 249-4076
> Ext:  44076
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
> Of Andre Massena
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 7:38 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Contention... II
> 
> I should have added this information in the first mail:
> 
> 
> MASDEF:
> 
>                                                               
>   
>  MASDEF   SHARED=CHECK,       /* MULTI ACCESS SPOOL   CHECK   
>   
>           RESTART=YES,CKPTLOCK=ACTION, /*                     
>   
>           DORMANCY=(100,500), /*                              
>   
>           HOLD=1000,          /*                              
>   
>           LOCKOUT=1000        /*                              
>   
>  MEMBER(1) NAME=ADCD          /*                              
>   
>  MEMBER(2) NAME=BDCD          /*                              
>   
> 
> Both z/OS guests have an absolute share  of 15% (z/VM) of a
> 900 MIPS z10, so
> I would surmise it is not a "juice" problem...
> 
> 
> Andre
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> En réponse à Andre Massena <andre_mass...@lavache.com> :
> > ------------------ Début du message d'origine
> --------------------
> > 
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > 
> > have a bit of a problem here..
> > 
> > Doing a POC for a customer who wants to run a SysPlex under
> > z/VM (5.4).
> > 
> > Two members in the Plex both at z/OS 1.10 JES2 (same RSU). 
> > 
> > As per RMF, I am not seeing any bottlenecks in XCF or CPU
> > usage, z/VM is not
> > complaining either, no appreciable paging or CPU use.
> > 
> > I am seeing however constant enqueues on the HASPxx DASD.
> The
> > only place I
> > am using DASD WRKALLEG is for the CF DASD. I am NOT using
> this
> > option for
> > the JES DASD as it were.
> > 
> > As would be expected from the situation outlined above, the
> > response times
> > are abominable.
> > 
> > Anyone had the same problem in the past?
> > 
> > Replies much appreciated.
> > 
> > 
> > Andre
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ** Cross-posted to IBM-Main also. **
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > www.lavache.com : l'email gratuit sans pub, vachement meuh.
> > www.hugolescargot.com : coloriage, fiches recettes et
> > bricolage, chansons, etc.
> > www.jeux-gratuits.com : des jeux en ligne pour toute la
> > famille.
> > 
> > ------------------- Fin du message d'origine
> ---------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> www.lavache.com : l'email gratuit sans pub, vachement meuh.
> www.hugolescargot.com : coloriage, fiches recettes et
> bricolage, chansons, etc.
> www.jeux-gratuits.com : des jeux en ligne pour toute la
> famille.
> 
> ------------------- Fin du message d'origine ---------------------




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.lavache.com : l'email gratuit sans pub, vachement meuh.
www.hugolescargot.com : coloriage, fiches recettes et bricolage, chansons, etc.
www.jeux-gratuits.com : des jeux en ligne pour toute la famille.

Reply via email to