David,

Isn't the problem that the virtual CF machines are not responding? 

If that is the case, then I don't understand why the IOCP would be 
involved... it's all virtual.  During initialization following the 
XAUTOLOG, the virtual CF machine is supposed to read the actual CF code 
from the HMC - the same place that the real CFs load their code. 

If you are getting time-outs during virtual CF initialization, perhaps 
there's something happening on the HMC during the XAUTOLOG.  Or maybe a 
problem with the micro-code on the HMC.  How up-to-date is the microcode 
on that z9?  Or as mentioned before.... some configuration not set 
properly on the HMC (go back to the "Running Guest Operating Systems" 
manual?)

I'm doing nothing more than what most everyone else is doing... guessing 
from a remote vantage point.  It's a bit like "remote viewing" in the 
movie "Men Who Stare at Goats".  (bahh-ahh)   :-)

Mike Walter
Aon Corporation
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.




"David Booher" <david.boo...@quest.com> 

Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
06/14/2011 08:44 AM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR






Forgive my ignorance, but is this all defined in the IOCP?  Because the 
IOCP is very generic and most of the stuff is SHARED.  I don?t see 
anything in the current IOCP that sets any partition apart from the other. 
 BTW, this is a z9 that?s having trouble: 
 
<snip>
         IOCONFIG ID=33
         ID    MSG2='SYS1.IODF33 - Z9 23JAN08',SYSTEM=(7060,1),        *
               TOK=('M3000H30',00800001AD0E2094202540630106302F00000000*
               ,00000000,'06-10-29','20:25:40','SYS1','IODF99')
*
      RESOURCE PARTITION=((CSS(0),(CFE1,9),(CFE2,A),                   +
               (PART1,1),(PART2,2),(PART3,3),(PART4,4),                +
               (PART5,5),(PART6,6),(PART7,7),(PART8,8)))
</snip>
 
 
Dave
 
 
 
 
 
 
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On 
Behalf Of gclo...@br.ibm.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 8:23 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR
 
David, 
I don't have access to a Z10, so it is only speculation. 
Something to check: 
Are the CF Processors dedicated to CF LPAR? 
The VM LPAR have access to at least one CF processor? 
Is VM LPAR running in Mode VM?
Follow this line... 
______________________________________________
Clovis 


From: 
David Booher <david.boo...@quest.com> 
To: 
IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu 
Date: 
09/06/2011 12:25 
Subject: 
Re: Question regarding zVM and CF when running in a LPAR 
Sent by: 
The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu>
 




Yes, I see what you see on my zVM 4.4 system running on my z800 here in 
Chicago, but the z10 in the UK runs zVM in an LPAR and gives the strange 
messages indicated below. 

I saw Alan's response, but I'm unsure how to proceed.  I know they are 
running CFs in LPARs on the z10, so I don't think it's a "licensing" 
issue... Is it just a matter of exposing the CF processors to the zVM 
LPAR?  Is this a requirement for zVM 5.3? 

No, the CF inside of zVM on this z10 has never been tried before.  I want 
to get it working so I can test my DB2 version 10 SYSPLEX there, because 
DB2 won't run on my z800 here in Chicago. 

My messages are cryptic at best.  I particularly like the one I got back 
from trying to SEND the CF machine as message while it was "supposedly" 
loading.

09:40:56 XAUTOLOG CFCC4
09:40:56 COMMAND ACCEPTED
09:40:56 AUTO LOGON  ***       CFCC4    USERS = 16    BY OPERATOR
CFCC4   : HCPMFT2816I LOADING MESSAGE PROCESSOR CFCC4 FROM THE PROCESSOR 
CONTROL
LER.
09:43:32 SEND CFCC4 HELP
CFCC4   : HCPPCX6531E THE OPERATING SYSTEM WILL NOT ACCEPT COMMANDS FROM 
THE SERVICE PROCESSOR.
CFCC4   : HCPMFT2814E THE REQUEST TO LOAD CFCC4 FROM THE PROCESSOR 
CONTROLLER DID NOT COMPLETE IN THE ALLOTTED TIME.
CFCC4   : HCPMFT260E IPL COMMAND PROCESSING CANNOT COMPLETE DUE TO ERRORS.


Dave Booher
Quest Software








The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages 
sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by 
applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies 
and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to 
be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or 
contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate 
with us by e-mail. 

Reply via email to