-----Original Message-----
From: IceHorses@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of Karen Thomas


>>> You conveniently miss that joints are a consideration in the Legs, 
>>> quality section as well.


No, I didn't "conveniently miss" that, Phil.  I mentioned distinctly in 
several posts that I find it odd that the part of the legs that I consider 
most important, the JOINTS, are only judged 3%.  I also went to the trouble 
to cut and paste the entire weighting formula, showing how the 40% is 
distributed.  If you missed that in my posts, I'm sorry.
----------------------------------------------------------

I know it does not matter to you but the 3%, as you say, is for the "Legs,
joints" section. There is also a "Legs, quality" section that is worth 6%.

The first notes from that section are for "correct limbs" and then "strong
joints". 

There may not be enough emphasis placed on the limbs for you or a number of
list members but you don't have to try and make your point by ignoring what
is there.

----------------------------------------------------------
*Karen wrote from a second post

How many of us have talked about all the good information we've learned from
Liz Graves at her clinics?
---------------------------------------------------------- 

It is all well and good that Liz Graves has taught you what to look for. But
how does that help the breed as a whole. Liz does not have the capacity to
look at all Icelandic breeding stock. 

So I ask again; Does anyone know of evaluations from other breeds or
disciplines that we can look at?


Phil

Reply via email to